By Greg Collier
In an unprecedented move, the Social Security Administration (SSA) is enacting drastic policy changes that will make it harder for millions of Americans to access their earned benefits by requiring in-person identity verification for new applicants and those updating their direct deposit information. Meanwhile, the Trump administration and Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) are simultaneously shutting down SSA offices across the country and setting the stage for systemic collapse.
This isn’t just government inefficiency or mismanagement, it’s a calculated attack on some of the most vulnerable members of society, older Americans, the disabled, and children who rely on Social Security benefits. The sheer cruelty of these policies echoes the tactics of authoritarian regimes throughout history that have sought to ‘thin out’ populations deemed economically burdensome.
A System Designed to Fail
On the surface, the justification for these changes sounds reasonable. The SSA claims to be fighting fraud, citing an alleged $100 million in annual direct deposit fraud. However, a congressional report from 2023 found that, over a five-year period, total fraud losses were significantly lower. This raises the question: If fraud isn’t the real problem, then what is?
The answer may lie in the administration’s broader agenda. Elon Musk, who has taken a leading role in restructuring federal agencies through DOGE, has repeatedly called Social Security a ‘Ponzi scheme’ and insists it is unsustainable. By intentionally creating barriers to access, by forcing elderly and disabled individuals to travel long distances to SSA offices that may no longer exist, the administration is making it as difficult as possible for people to claim benefits. This will inevitably lead to fewer recipients, a convenient excuse to declare the program “failing” and push for privatization.
Historical Parallels: Euthanasia by Bureaucracy
History is filled with examples of authoritarian regimes using bureaucratic mechanisms to control or eliminate “undesirable” populations. In Nazi Germany, the T4 euthanasia program was disguised as a public health measure, targeting the disabled and chronically ill as “useless eaters” who drained state resources. The program didn’t begin with mass killings, it started with bureaucratic hurdles, institutional neglect, and calculated starvation.
Similarly, the Soviet Union under Stalin weaponized bureaucracy to starve opposition groups and suppress political dissent. The Holodomor, the state-engineered famine in Ukraine, saw government officials create impossible hurdles for Ukrainians to access food while denying the existence of a crisis. Bureaucratic cruelty is a hallmark of authoritarian governance.
While the U.S. is not executing people, the principle is eerily similar. By making it more difficult for seniors, the disabled, and vulnerable populations to access their benefits, the government is ensuring that some will suffer and even die from the consequences. For an 80-year-old retiree living on Social Security, missing a check due to an impossible bureaucratic requirement can mean the difference between paying rent or becoming homeless, between affording medication or suffering a preventable medical crisis.
The Political Fallout
Democrats and advocacy groups have responded with outrage. Rep. John Larson (D-CT) has called out the administration’s real goal, to create chaos within the SSA to justify dismantling it. AARP has warned that the elimination of phone verification will cause catastrophic delays, and Gov. Andy Beshear of Kentucky has accused the administration of intentionally trying to kick people off the program.
Meanwhile, voters at town halls nationwide have voiced their fury at the cuts. Lawsuits have already been filed to block DOGE from accessing SSA data, citing privacy and security concerns. Yet, the administration continues to push forward, disregarding the millions of people who will be left stranded by these changes.
The Path Forward
The fight for Social Security is about more than just benefits, it’s about protecting the fundamental right of Americans to retire and live with dignity. If these policies remain unchecked, we could see the slow erosion of one of the most successful social safety nets in U.S. history. And if history teaches us anything, it’s that bureaucratic cruelty is never just about inefficiency, it’s about control.
The question now is: Will the American people allow their government to quietly wage war on its most vulnerable citizens, or will they fight back before it’s too late?
Discover more from The Broad Lens
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
